Lialiaci is a publication of the iTaukei Institute of Language and Culture, Ministry of iTaukei Affairs, Fiji. Lialiaci means to ponder or reflect upon deeply. That is the intent of these articles and perspectives on culture. This publication topics are as follows:\n\nThe Vanua Spirituality written by Mr. Anasa Tawake, \nFijian Bread written by Mr. Ulaiasi Taoi,\nThe five Cultural Protected Water Body Types in Fiji by Mr. Ron Vave.

In many cultures, there is a concept of expected gendered roles where people perform certain functions, parts, or kinds of a cultural or social activity according to their gender. Men are expected to be strong and masculine, and employ the roles which are more related to hard labor, leadership, and literacy. Women, traditionally, assume feminine and maternal characteristics and roles in supporting men in their social events. Although these notions of gender qualities and roles differ from culture to culture, it is often found that the traditional customs which dictate who can and cannot participate in specific parts of the culture are often bounded by gender stereotypes and taboos.

Discussion on “Indigenous and Other Ritual Specialists in the Philippines - Culture Change” Dr. Jesus T. Peralta’s presentation is based on the Pagdiwata Ritual of the Tagbanwa tribe of Palaan, the house blessing ritual of the Kaling family, and the harvest ritual of the Ipugao tribe. Through this presentation, though indirectly, I experienced the precedures, principal agent, and the characteristics of these three rituals. I’d like to know more about the details of the rituals themselves (the alcoholic drink used in the Pagdiwata ritual, the nature of the chicks sacrificed, etc) but I’ll check more about them on my own time. I’d like to ask two questions. As we can see in the title, the paper focuses on “Culture Change,” and my questions pertain to this subject.

After the Angkor was inscribed on the World Cultural Heritage List, it was necessary to establish working mechanisms to promote national and international collaboration.

Discourse about intangible cultural heritage is anchored on the question of memory, which has become a topic of great interest today not only within academia but also in popular culture. America’s newfound taste for cupcakes and macaroni and cheese, for instance, is not so much about society’s gastronomic craving for these foods, as it is about society’s craving for history and the comfort of things past. In essence, it is about restorative nostalgia and the memories that these foods evoke and make possible through the imaginary. Our preoccupation with memory and remembering, in large part, is driven by our recognition of the fragility of memory, a fragility that is underscored by this age of mass displacement in which we live. As the Iranian American writer Roya Hakakian notes in her recent memoir, “When you have been a refugee, abandoned all your loves and belongings, your memories become your belongings.” In a world where over 80 million people are currently forcibly displaced, amounting to one person being forcibly dislodged from his or her home and lifeways approximately every two seconds, dislocation, uprooting, and rupture are as much a facet of our lived experience as are connectivity and interdependence. Exilic condition is an unfortunate but undeniable feature of modernity.\nEven within living memory, Asia has had her share of tumultuous histories. Colonization, conflict, war, and other calamities have engendered mass dispersal. Over 2 million Vietnamese, Cambodians and Laotians fled their homelands in the aftermath of war, revolution and genocide, and many more Southeast Asians continue to be displaced in varied contexts and conditions as we speak. The genocide in Cambodia left deep wounds and ravaging effects on the cultural memories of the nation that is now bifurcated between Asia and the diaspora. Even without the trauma of war and mass atrocities, globalization, modernization, and urbanization have progressively divested traditional knowledge of its merits, and peripheralized certain memories into oblivion.

Pebaek was one of the important ritual procedures of a traditional wedding ceremony. The ritual was performed at the groom’s house after the bride finished the wedding ceremony at her house. Pebaek was to introduce herself properly to her new in-laws and, her rst greetings were to the inlaw parents and relatives.

Papua New Guinea is one of the most culturally diverse countries in the world, with over 750 languages representing 750 ethnic groups. Papua New Guinea is made up of 24 provincial governments, and the nation is divided into four regions known as Momase, the Highlands, New Guinea Islands, and the Southern Region.

On this beautiful day of the harvesting season in autumn, when hundreds of fruits and grains are ripening and trees in the mountains and fields are tinging maple colours, I am very delighted and filled with the feeling of great honor that our Centre of UNESCO for Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia and Pacific Region (ICHCAP) is privileged to host this year International Conference on Safeguarding ICH to reflect on the creative values and productive utility of our intangible heritage that our forefathers have inherited to us.

This paper intends to describe the role and function of Shaman in Myanmar society. The background history of Shaman, the role and function of Shaman, Natkadaw in Myanmar society, and the current situations of Shaman living in Yangon, are elicited. Especially, what are the essential or key factors to become a Shaman in Myanmar, why Myanmar people believe in Nats (spirits), how they offer to the Nats, when they offer to the Nats, what are necessary, who is essential for this ritual or ceremony and how the Shaman maintains and transmits his or her super power from generation to generation are discussed. Descriptive or exploratory and oral history methods are used as the research designs. Secondary analysis, key informant interview are conducted for data collection. As the result outcomes, why Shaman is important to safeguard as Myanmar intangible cultural heritage, why and how the government safeguard the Shaman officially are explored.

Gender equality is a core value of the international community, being one of the 17 sustainable development goals and crosscutting into 9 other goals such as zero hunger, health and nutrition, quality education and decent work. The 2003 Convention also stresses that heritage safeguarding and transmission activities shall be compatible with human rights and relevant policies shall be without discrimination, covering the concept of gender equality. More specifically, Chapter 6 of the Convention’s Operational Directives states, “States Parties shall endeavor to foster the contributions of intangible cultural heritage and its safeguarding to greater gender equality and to eliminating gender-based discrimination.”(UNESCO, 2016) A 2018 report from the UNESCO evaluation body mentioned the following in its review of nomination files. Firstly, majority of nomination files lacked explanation regarding gender roles and the participation of both genders in nomination and safeguarding. Second, the Convention does not expect equal participation by both genders, but rather hopes to understand the different ways the heritage is experienced by the respective genders, what the gender roles are, and whether they have equal rights with respect to safeguarding (UNESCO, 2018). Although gender is a topic of great interest internationally, there hasn’t been much discourse on the relationship between intangible heritage and gender. Thus, this presentation looks at the value of gender considerations in intangible heritage safeguarding.

The scope of intangible cultural heritage related to human well-being is large. Many cultural practices, if not the majority of them, were designed by communities, groups and individuals for well-being purposes, be it physical or mental. Such practices are also intended to ensure the con-tinuity of the society over time and to maintain social order. According to Napier, those practices related to human body and soul are embodied in cultural systems of value (Napier 2014) that overwhelm them. The representations of those two components of the human being, body and soul, are tightly linked in traditional cultures. Thus, many cultural practices were designed for the well-being of both of them. They also mix therapies intended to bring about the relief of each and/or both. \n

“ICH and Gender” introduces the mutual relationship between gender norms and ICH and emphasizes that understanding the intimacy between ICH and gender is important for effective ICH safeguarding and gender equality.